Blockchain Industry Standards: Why a Comprehensive Solution Like RMA™ Is Critical for the Future of Web3

by

in
– 9 mins read

Table of Contents

Introduction

As blockchain technology revolutionizes industries worldwide, the need for trusted, reliable standards has become increasingly urgent. Despite numerous efforts, the blockchain and Web3 ecosystem still lacks a comprehensive industry standard addressing the technical and operational challenges companies face. Governments, global organizations, and standard-setting bodies have explored regulating and standardizing blockchain practices. However, these attempts have often been slow to evolve, fragmented in scope, and focused on specific segments rather than the industry as a whole.

VaaSBlock’s Risk Management Authentication (RMA™) offers a groundbreaking solution. Explicitly designed for blockchain companies, the RMA™ certification addresses the most critical issues in the space—credibility, security, and transparency. Unlike previous initiatives, RMA™ is holistic, blockchain-native, and adaptable, making it the first standard to elevate the entire Web3 ecosystem.

About the Author

Kevin Ahn

Kevin Ahn — Co-founder of VaaSBlock

Kevin Ahn is a trusted authority on blockchain compliance. With extensive experience ensuring security, transparency, and regulatory alignment in the blockchain industry, he has developed rigorous compliance protocols for numerous organizations. His expertise in smart contract vulnerabilities, risk management, and technical audits makes him a trusted advisor to industry leaders and regulators. Multilingual and well-versed in international blockchain developments, Kevin focuses on fortifying the credibility and operational integrity of blockchain projects in a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape. His insights provide invaluable guidance for navigating the complex intersection of technology, governance, and compliance in the Web3 space..


The Urgent Need for Blockchain Standards

Since its inception, blockchain technology has faced challenges from its complexity and misuse. Scams, fraudulent activities, and over-promising by some companies have tarnished the industry’s reputation. Many early players failed to deliver on their promises, leading investors, regulators, and the public to become skeptical of blockchain’s potential. Other projects were straight-up scams, robbing investors of their funds and leaving behind a tainted reputation for a technology that in its purest form, should increase trust.

Standards are desperately needed to mitigate these risks, enhance trust, and ensure that blockchain companies operate responsibly and credibly. Despite recognizing this need, attempts to establish formal blockchain standards have often fallen short due to several factors:

1. Slow Progress by Existing Standards Bodies

Countries have shown interest in setting blockchain standards, and organizations like the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) have initiated efforts to provide security frameworks for blockchain technology. For example, ISO/TC 307 is a technical committee dedicated to blockchain and distributed ledger technologies. However, these initiatives are often slow to adapt to the rapid evolution of Web3, leaving many companies without clear, current guidelines. ISO traditionally is very thin in scope for their standards, and an ISO for, say, blockchain code standards could fall short to ultimately improve the space’s reputation. Afterall smart contracting firms regularly audit and even give high scores to projects that don’t turn out to be legitimate. In 2022, it was estimated that investors lost 3.3 billion dollars in value from audited smart contracts that still ended up going sideways for investors.

Having said this, VaaSBlock is monitoring the progress of ISO/TC 307 to ensure we implement and complement this standard with our broad-focused RMA certification.

2. Limited Scope of Existing Efforts

Many initiatives, including those driven by regional governments and technical bodies like the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), have focused on category-specific or technical aspects of blockchain—such as interoperability, data protection, or cryptographic techniques. While important, these efforts only cover small segments of the industry and fail to address broader operational and governance concerns. investors.

3. Fragmented Regulatory Landscape

The regulatory environment for blockchain varies significantly across jurisdictions. This fragmentation creates confusion and compliance challenges for blockchain organizations operating internationally. Without a unified standard, companies struggle to navigate the complex web of regional regulations, hindering global adoption and trust.


Why a Comprehensive Industry Standard Is Necessary

The unique, decentralized nature of blockchain and Web3 demands a standard that is adaptable, robust, and multifaceted—mirroring the complexity of the technology and organizations.

Most attempts at creating a blockchain standard have concentrated on isolated elements, such as technical infrastructure (e.g., smart contracts) or regulatory compliance in specific jurisdictions. However, blockchain organizations are more than just technology stacks; they are businesses with operational risks, reputational challenges, and governance complexities. For a standard to be successful and impactful in the Web3 space, it must address several critical areas:

1. Reputation Risks

The blockchain industry has unfortunately attracted criminals, scammers, and unethical operators, creating a significant trust deficit with regulators and the public. Many companies over-promise and under-deliver, eroding investor confidence and consumer trust. A comprehensive standard is needed to distinguish legitimate businesses from those seeking to exploit the system, thereby restoring faith in the industry.

2. Accountability and Transparency

Blockchain projects have often been criticized for lacking transparency, with organizations failing to provide clear information on governance, team credentials, or operational practices. A robust standard can enforce accountability, ensuring that organizations meet well-defined benchmarks before earning public trust or attracting investment.

3. Operational and Governance Challenges

Blockchain organizations face unique governance issues due to decentralization. Traditional corporate governance models do not always apply, making it difficult to ensure accountability and effective decision-making. A comprehensive standard must address these governance complexities, providing frameworks for transparent and responsible management.

4. The Inadequacy of Partial Standards

Existing standards like ISO 27001 focus on information security management systems, while others examine blockchain interoperability or privacy. However, none cover the full spectrum of challenges blockchain companies face, particularly risks inherent in operational governance and market-facing performance. Partial standards fail to establish the widespread trust and credibility needed across the entire Web3 space.


RMA™: A Dedicated Solution for Blockchain Credibility

Only an organization solely focused on advancing the credibility of blockchain companies—and dedicated to improving the industry’s reputation—can effectively create a lasting standard that transforms the narrative around blockchain. Neutrality is vital to building something the industry will accept and being adaptable to evolving rules of the standard to ensure it remains effective. VaaSBlock’s RMA™ emerges as a pioneering certification that evaluates all critical aspects of a blockchain organization. Nothing like this has been attempted in the industry to date, and it already has more traction than any other standard, making it the leading and most likely choice for the successful industry standard in the long term. While not yet a requirement, soon, organizations wishing to work with large traditional companies and even other web3 organizations will need to show evidence of an RMA to proceed as credibility becomes the actual currency in the blockchain industry

Key Areas of Focus in the RMA™ Certification

1. Comprehensive Scope

RMA™ transcends traditional technical security assessments. It includes detailed evaluations of:

  • Business Credibility: Assessment of the organization’s history, mission, and market positioning.
  • Team Integrity: Verification of team members’ credentials, expertise, and reputations.
  • Governance Structures: Examination of organizational governance, including decision-making processes and accountability mechanisms.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Ensuring adherence to industry regulations and legal requirements across jurisdictions.
  • Operational Viability: Analysis of business models, financial health, and the ability to deliver on promises.

By addressing these diverse elements, RMA™ ensures that blockchain companies are credible in every aspect, not just secure in their technology.

2. Holistic Business Evaluation

RMA™ considers the broader operational risks that blockchain organizations face:

  • Legal Compliance: Verification of compliance with international laws and regulations, including anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements.
  • Operational Governance: Evaluation of internal controls, risk management practices, and organizational policies.
  • Deliverability: Assessment of the organization’s track record in meeting milestones and fulfilling commitments

This all-encompassing review ensures that certified organizations meet high standards of accountability and transparency.

3. Addressing Industry-Specific Risks

Unlike standards that focus on narrow areas, RMA™ tackles the unique risks inherent in the blockchain industry:

  • Fraud Prevention: Implementation of measures to prevent fraudulent activities, protecting investors and users.
  • Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Comprehensive audits to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities in smart contracts and decentralized applications.
  • Decentralized Governance Issues: Guidance on establishing effective governance models suitable for decentralized organizations.
  • Transparency Challenges: Mandating disclosure of critical information to stakeholders, enhancing trust.

By focusing on these factors, RMA™ helps organizations build credibility and resilience in the market.

4. Tokenization and Verifiable Trust

The RMA™ badge is issued as a tokenized, non-fungible token (NFT) that can be verified on the blockchain:

  • Tamper-Proof Certification: The NFT cannot be forged or altered, ensuring authenticity.
  • Decentralized Verification: Stakeholders can independently verify the certification without relying on centralized authorities.
  • Alignment with Blockchain Principles: Embraces decentralization and transparency, reinforcing the organization’s commitment to blockchain ideals.

This innovative approach enhances trust in a way that traditional certifications cannot.


Why RMA™ Will Succeed Where Others Have Struggled

The blockchain industry requires more than fragmented standards; it needs a holistic approach that evolves alongside the technology. RMA™ is positioned to succeed due to several key factors:

1. Adaptability

The blockchain space is dynamic, with rapid technological advancements and shifting regulatory landscapes. RMA™, as a blockchain-native certification, is designed to adapt to industry changes:

  • Continuous Updates: Regularly revises standards to incorporate new technologies, threats, and regulatory requirements.
  • Flexible Framework: Allows for customization based on the organization’s specific context and needs.
  • Proactive Approach: Anticipates future challenges and incorporates them into the certification criteria.

2. Global Applicability

Many existing standards are regional or sector-specific, limiting their usefulness for organizations operating internationally. RMA™ offers:

  • Universal Relevance: Applicable to any blockchain organization, regardless of location or sector.
  • Cross-Border Compliance: Helps organizations navigate international regulations, reducing compliance burdens.
  • Inclusivity: Accommodates diverse business models and organizational structures within the blockchain ecosystem.

3. Full Industry Engagement

RMA™ resonates with key stakeholders who matter most:

  • Investors: Provides assurance of an organization’s credibility, reducing investment risks.
  • Exchanges: Facilitates listing processes by demonstrating compliance and operational integrity.
  • Blockchain Projects: Offers a benchmark for best practices, fostering industry-wide improvements.

By addressing industry-specific issues like smart contract vulnerabilities and governance, RMA™ becomes the go-to certification for blockchain organizations seeking to establish or enhance their credibility.


Conclusion: A New Era of Blockchain Standards with RMA™

The blockchain industry faces unique challenges—from reputational issues due to fraud to the complexities of decentralized governance—that require a new kind of standard. VaaSBlock’s RMA™ stands out as the only holistic certification capable of addressing the full spectrum of issues blockchain organizations encounter.

By combining technical security audits with business governance evaluations and operational reviews, RMA™ offers an unparalleled level of credibility. It is not merely about checking boxes; it’s about transforming the narrative around blockchain, fostering an ecosystem of trust, and ensuring that blockchain companies can succeed long-term while upholding the highest standards of integrity.

In an environment where other standards struggle to keep pace with technological advancements, RMA™ is paving the way for the future of blockchain. It provides the comprehensive solution the industry desperately needs, setting a new benchmark for credibility, trust, and operational excellence in Web3.